Close Menu
reNEWSreNEWS
  • Home
  • Offshore Wind
  • Onshore Wind
  • Solar
  • Other News
    • Energy Storage
    • Finance
    • Grid
    • People
    • reMIX
  • More
    • Company Profiles
    • Events
    • National Wind Energy Awards 2026
Latest News

PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

All-Energy 2026: Shanks bullish on UK clean power

GWEC, TÜREB launch wind partnership

LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
  • Email Briefings
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
reNEWSreNEWS
  • Home
  • Offshore Wind

    PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

    May 13, 2026

    UK offshore wind pipeline reaches 93GW

    May 13, 2026

    Seaway7 completes Hai Long cable works

    May 13, 2026

    DEME names new jack-up vessel

    May 13, 2026

    Mubadala invests $325m into Hornsea 3

    May 13, 2026
  • Onshore Wind

    ENERCON to build Türkiye blade plant

    May 13, 2026

    ‘Fatality at South Korean wind farm’

    May 13, 2026

    Scottish onshore wind forum launches

    May 12, 2026

    ENOVA starts 30MW Hiddels repowering

    May 12, 2026

    Iberdrola buys 40MW Italian wind farm

    May 12, 2026
  • Solar

    VSB secures Sicily PV project approval

    May 13, 2026

    Matrix connects two Spanish renewable projects

    May 13, 2026

    Qualitas targets €10bn energy investments

    May 12, 2026

    Consultation opens for 49.9MW Barrons Solar

    May 12, 2026

    Great North Road solar nears decision

    May 11, 2026
  • Other News
    • Energy Storage
    • Finance
    • Grid
    • People
    • reMIX
  • More
    • Company Profiles
    • Events
    • National Wind Energy Awards 2026
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
reNEWSreNEWS
Home » Uncategorized » Bird groups file lawsuit over Icebreaker
Offshore Wind

Bird groups file lawsuit over Icebreaker

SaraBy SaraDecember 12, 20194 Mins Read
Icebreaker 'steering right course'

American Bird Conservancy (ABC) and Black Swamp Bird Observatory (BSBO) have filed a law suit in federal court in relation to bird collision risks at the 21MW Icebreaker offshore wind farm in Lake Erie.

The suit has been filed against the US Department of Energy (DoE) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for “failure to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Clean Water Act, respectively, during their evaluation of environmental impacts and alternatives associated with the Icebreaker Wind project”.

Advertisement

The complaint seeks to require that the DoE complete an environmental impact statement (EIS) and comprehensive cumulative impacts assessment, and that both agencies complete a legally adequate alternatives analysis.

Icebreaker’s developer LEEDco told reNEWS that in consultation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), significant investment has been made in resources to conduct detailed studies regarding the use of the project area by birds.

LEEDco stated: “Contrary to the generic assertions in the statement by ABC and BSBO, these surveys consistently demonstrated very low bird activity within the project area.

“Based on that data, the USFWS ultimately concluded that the project poses ‘limited direct risk’ to migratory birds and dropped its initial recommendation that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared.”

Furthermore, LEEDco added, “We believe the US DoE and USACE have fully and faithfully carried out their obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act to evaluate the impact of the project on all aspects of the environment.

“That process included consultation with the USFWS and other federal and state agencies. As required by NEPA, the agencies prepared an Environmental Assessment that was exceptionally detailed and thorough. On the basis of that assessment they determined that Icebreaker would have no significant impact to birds, and no significant impact on the environment.

“Therefore, in accordance with NEPA, preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not warranted and would not add to the analysis beyond additional expense and delay.”

According to the ABC and the BSBO constructing turbines in the proposed project site would pose “substantial collision” risks to the enormous numbers of birds that use the area throughout the year, including large concentrations of migrating songbirds, as well as Common Loons, globally significant populations of Red-breasted Mergansers, and other waterfowl.

In a statement the groups said: “Further, construction and increased vessel traffic associated with the project could pollute the waters used by these species.

“Despite this, the agencies have failed to adequately evaluate environmental impacts and reasonable alternatives that would reduce the project’s impacts.”

ABC president Mike Parr said: “We regret that legal action is our only recourse.

“The agencies did not give this project the careful evaluation it requires under applicable environmental laws. In addition, American tax dollars are paying for more than a third of the project cost – but a Norwegian corporation is in partnership with the nonprofit project implementer, LEEDCo.

“Data published in September showed that North America has already lost around 29% of its bird population,” said Parr. “This project is an example of how birds are routinely ignored when business decisions are involved. Since birds are a public good, and taxpayer dollars are involved in benefiting a private company in this case, the agencies should be doing a much better job here.”

The site selected by the developer, the Central Basin of Lake Erie, is within a National Audubon Society-designated Global Important Bird Area that draws millions of birds annually, according to the ABC.

Radar studies conducted by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) have recorded large numbers of migratory birds and bats near Great Lakes shorelines, including Lake Erie’s south shore. Many were flying at altitudes that would be within the rotor-swept area of wind turbines, making these birds susceptible to collision-related deaths, injuries, and disturbances, said the ABC and the BSBO.

BSBO director Kimberly Kaufman said: “Existing data from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources shows that this area is important for huge numbers of birds.

“The inadequate science provided by the applicant understates the risk. This highlights the importance of conducting a more comprehensive assessment of environmental impacts.”

LEEDco added, “The clean energy that these turbines will generate is an important step toward reducing emissions and pollution, and combating climate change, which will provide great benefits to birds and other wildlife as well as all Ohioans.

“That is why Icebreaker is supported by the most respected environmental organizations, including the Sierra Club, the Environmental Defense Fund and the Ohio Environmental Council.”

DoE Icebreaker Leedco Offshore Wind
Share. Facebook LinkedIn Bluesky Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
Previous ArticleSenegal giant reaches first power milestone
Next Article Skyline taps Greenbyte to watch over 3GW portfolio

Related News

AI bird wind farm tracker proves effective

April 25, 2025

US lawmakers urge change to Icebreaker shutdown rules

July 30, 2020

Icebreaker inches towards construction

May 16, 2019
Advertisement

Latest News

PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

May 13, 2026

All-Energy 2026: Shanks bullish on UK clean power

May 13, 2026

GWEC, TÜREB launch wind partnership

May 13, 2026

ENERCON to build Türkiye blade plant

May 13, 2026
Advertisement

Advertisement

Company Profiles
  • Collett & Sons Ltd
  • Leask Marine
  • Seaway7
    Seaway7
  • Pembroke Port
  • Ørsted
  • Oceantic Network
  • Navantia Seanergies
    Navantia Seanergies
  • Natural Power
    Natural Power
  • Full Circle Wind Services
  • Bilfinger UK
reNEWS
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
reMIX | Company Profiles | Industry Events
Get in touch | Advertising with us | About reNEWS

© 2026 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}