Close Menu
reNEWSreNEWS
  • Home
  • Offshore Wind
  • Onshore Wind
  • Solar
  • Other News
    • Energy Storage
    • Finance
    • Grid
    • People
    • reMIX
  • More
    • Company Profiles
    • Events
    • National Wind Energy Awards 2026
Latest News

PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

All-Energy 2026: Shanks bullish on UK clean power

GWEC, TÜREB launch wind partnership

LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
  • Email Briefings
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
reNEWSreNEWS
  • Home
  • Offshore Wind

    PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

    May 13, 2026

    UK offshore wind pipeline reaches 93GW

    May 13, 2026

    Seaway7 completes Hai Long cable works

    May 13, 2026

    DEME names new jack-up vessel

    May 13, 2026

    Mubadala invests $325m into Hornsea 3

    May 13, 2026
  • Onshore Wind

    ENERCON to build Türkiye blade plant

    May 13, 2026

    ‘Fatality at South Korean wind farm’

    May 13, 2026

    Scottish onshore wind forum launches

    May 12, 2026

    ENOVA starts 30MW Hiddels repowering

    May 12, 2026

    Iberdrola buys 40MW Italian wind farm

    May 12, 2026
  • Solar

    VSB secures Sicily PV project approval

    May 13, 2026

    Matrix connects two Spanish renewable projects

    May 13, 2026

    Qualitas targets €10bn energy investments

    May 12, 2026

    Consultation opens for 49.9MW Barrons Solar

    May 12, 2026

    Great North Road solar nears decision

    May 11, 2026
  • Other News
    • Energy Storage
    • Finance
    • Grid
    • People
    • reMIX
  • More
    • Company Profiles
    • Events
    • National Wind Energy Awards 2026
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
reNEWSreNEWS
Home » Uncategorized » AMEP facing delays after ‘disappointing’ SeAH switch
Offshore Wind

AMEP facing delays after ‘disappointing’ SeAH switch

Stephen DunneBy Stephen DunneFebruary 14, 20223 Mins Read
AMEP set for take-off after government backing

Able Group has confirmed its planned Able Marine Energy Park (AMEP) will be “inevitably delayed” by SeAH’s decision to pull the plug on an agreement to build a monopile factory at the site.

Peter Stephenson, Able’s executive chairman, said that development of AMEP (illustrated) on the South Bank of the Humber Estuary would move forward despite the Korean steel manufacturer’s “disappointing” decision to move its proposed factory to Teesside.

Advertisement

Stephenson argued that Siemens Gamesa’s unprecedented success in winning turbine orders for offshore wind projects being submitted into the current CfD round was indirectly to blame for SeAH’s move.

He said: “The AMEP project needs to secure commitment from other key manufacturers. They, in turn, need to secure their own initial orders to justify their investment. Their immediate opportunity was within the soon to be completed (April/July) CfD allocation Round 4 process for c. 7.0GW of new installed offshore wind capacity.

“However, as things stand Siemens Gamesa – who supply blades from an existing UK facility (Hull) – have had unprecedented success in this round and at the significant expense of their competitors seeking to establish facilities at AMEP.”

Stephenson added that SeAH has secured a monopile order and need to start constructing its facilities in Q2 2022 but that Able “cannot commit” to quay construction at AMEP until it has a minimum of two key manufacturers to provide guaranteed income streams.

The chairman also hit out at Teesworks, where SeAH has chosen to build the monopile plant, arguing that Able finds itself competing with a taxpayer-funded development.

“Whilst recognising that AMEP has been offered grant support from Government, the reality is that this pales into insignificance compared to the levels of subsidy with which we now have to compete against”, he said.

Able is now looking to annual CfD auctions as a lifeline for the energy park.

BEIS announced last week that it is planning to hold the auctions every year from March 2023 and Stephenson believes that this, in turn, “should provide the level of activity to enable progress”.

Local MP Martin Vickers has meanwhile voiced disappointment with SeAH’s decision and said he and Greater Grimsby MP Lia Nici have already raised the issue with Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

Vickers, whose Cleethorpes constituency includes the proposed site for AMEP, added that SeAH’s participation was crucial to the project and that ministerial colleagues “are looking into the circumstances” of what happened. 

AMEP BEIS Europe Offshore Wind SeAH Steel Siemens Gamesa UK
Share. Facebook LinkedIn Bluesky Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
Previous ArticleSeAH to relocate UK monopile factory to Teesside
Next Article BlackRock invests in Chilean solar projects

Related News

Government backs Smulders, SeAH Wind on UK yards

July 7, 2021

Able ‘in talks’ to attract offshore suppliers to AMEP

October 6, 2020

SeAH Steel chooses Humber port for monopile factory

September 18, 2020
Advertisement

Latest News

PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

May 13, 2026

All-Energy 2026: Shanks bullish on UK clean power

May 13, 2026

GWEC, TÜREB launch wind partnership

May 13, 2026

ENERCON to build Türkiye blade plant

May 13, 2026
Advertisement

Advertisement

Company Profiles
  • Collett & Sons Ltd
  • Seaway7
    Seaway7
  • Qualsurv Marine Consulting
    Qualsurv Marine Consulting
  • Pembroke Port
  • Oceantic Network
  • Navantia Seanergies
    Navantia Seanergies
  • JDR Cable Systems Ltd
  • Full Circle Wind Services
  • EEW
    EEW Special Pipe Constructions GmbH
  • EDF
    EDF
reNEWS
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
reMIX | Company Profiles | Industry Events
Get in touch | Advertising with us | About reNEWS

© 2026 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}