Close Menu
reNEWSreNEWS
  • Home
  • Offshore Wind
  • Onshore Wind
  • Solar
  • Other News
    • Energy Storage
    • Finance
    • Grid
    • People
    • reMIX
  • More
    • Company Profiles
    • Events
    • National Wind Energy Awards 2026
Latest News

PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

All-Energy 2026: Shanks bullish on UK clean power

GWEC, TÜREB launch wind partnership

LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
  • Email Briefings
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
reNEWSreNEWS
  • Home
  • Offshore Wind

    PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

    May 13, 2026

    UK offshore wind pipeline reaches 93GW

    May 13, 2026

    Seaway7 completes Hai Long cable works

    May 13, 2026

    DEME names new jack-up vessel

    May 13, 2026

    Mubadala invests $325m into Hornsea 3

    May 13, 2026
  • Onshore Wind

    ENERCON to build Türkiye blade plant

    May 13, 2026

    ‘Fatality at South Korean wind farm’

    May 13, 2026

    Scottish onshore wind forum launches

    May 12, 2026

    ENOVA starts 30MW Hiddels repowering

    May 12, 2026

    Iberdrola buys 40MW Italian wind farm

    May 12, 2026
  • Solar

    VSB secures Sicily PV project approval

    May 13, 2026

    Matrix connects two Spanish renewable projects

    May 13, 2026

    Qualitas targets €10bn energy investments

    May 12, 2026

    Consultation opens for 49.9MW Barrons Solar

    May 12, 2026

    Great North Road solar nears decision

    May 11, 2026
  • Other News
    • Energy Storage
    • Finance
    • Grid
    • People
    • reMIX
  • More
    • Company Profiles
    • Events
    • National Wind Energy Awards 2026
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
reNEWSreNEWS
Home » Uncategorized » BWO refutes claims it is ‘anti-conservation’
Offshore Wind

BWO refutes claims it is ‘anti-conservation’

SaraBy SaraJanuary 23, 20252 Mins Read
7GW tender result 'shows commitment to Germany'

The German Wind Energy Offshore Association (BWO) has hit back at claims the trade body intends to position itself against marine nature conservation in the election campaign.

BWO’s managing director Stefan Thimm (pictured) said that NABU is misinterpreting the group’s political demands in the run-up to the Bundestag elections.

Advertisement

“We are concerned with lower costs for grid expansion through optimized land use planning.

“This reduces the costs of the energy transition and thus the price of electricity, thus advancing climate protection.

“More climate protection, in turn, protects ecosystems on land and at sea.

“The Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency decides which areas are used for offshore wind.”

In addition to calling for more land for offshore wind energy, NABU had stated the BWO was also calling for dismantling of environmental standards and the cost-effective laying of cables through the marine protected area “Sylter Außenriff”. NABU head of Marine Conservation Kim Detloff said: “As a consequence of slipstream effects and yield losses due to far too dense development of the North Sea with wind turbines, established planning and environmental criteria are now to be abolished.

“This no longer seems to be about nature-friendly climate protection, but profit maximization.

“The damage to ecosystems is getting completely out of hand.

“It does not need more, but less pollution of the North Sea and Baltic Sea. While the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services are calling for joint measures for climate and nature conservation, parts of politics and industry in Germany are turning ecological allies into opponents.

“We need a new marine spatial planning that focuses on ecological criteria.”

Thimm said that the BWO continues to advocate that the environmental impact assessment for offshore wind farms be maintained.

“We reject the plans of the incumbent federal government to abolish these checks in the implementation of the EU Directive RED III,” he said, adding, “in order to understand the effects of wind farms on the distribution of guillemots and razorbills in the German North Sea, we commissioned a study by the renowned environmental institutes IBL Umweltplanung and BioConsult SH.

“At the end of 2024, this came to the conclusion that the behaviour of guillemots and razorbills near offshore wind farms shows strong seasonal and regional differences.

“Compared to other studies, a blanket large-scale avoidance could not be confirmed.”

BWO Offshore Wind
Share. Facebook LinkedIn Bluesky Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
Previous ArticleAmarenco secures €500m solar financing
Next Article Senvion scoops 122MW turbine order

Related News

BWO welcomes Hamburg blueprint

January 27, 2026

BWO seeks offshore wind auction reform in Germany

June 24, 2025

Thimm to lead BWO for another five years

March 7, 2025
Advertisement

Latest News

PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

May 13, 2026

All-Energy 2026: Shanks bullish on UK clean power

May 13, 2026

GWEC, TÜREB launch wind partnership

May 13, 2026

ENERCON to build Türkiye blade plant

May 13, 2026
Advertisement

Advertisement

Company Profiles
  • TGS
  • Seaway7
    Seaway7
  • Pembroke Port
  • Oceantic Network
  • Natural Power
    Natural Power
  • Full Circle Wind Services
  • EEW
    EEW Special Pipe Constructions GmbH
  • EDF
    EDF
  • Brightwind
    BrightWind Limited
  • Bilfinger UK
reNEWS
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
reMIX | Company Profiles | Industry Events
Get in touch | Advertising with us | About reNEWS

© 2026 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}