Close Menu
reNEWSreNEWS
  • Home
  • Offshore Wind
  • Onshore Wind
  • Solar
  • Other News
    • Energy Storage
    • Finance
    • Grid
    • People
    • reMIX
  • More
    • Company Profiles
    • Events
    • National Wind Energy Awards 2026
Latest News

PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

All-Energy 2026: Shanks bullish on UK clean power

GWEC, TÜREB launch wind partnership

LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
  • Email Briefings
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
reNEWSreNEWS
  • Home
  • Offshore Wind

    PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

    May 13, 2026

    UK offshore wind pipeline reaches 93GW

    May 13, 2026

    Seaway7 completes Hai Long cable works

    May 13, 2026

    DEME names new jack-up vessel

    May 13, 2026

    Mubadala invests $325m into Hornsea 3

    May 13, 2026
  • Onshore Wind

    ENERCON to build Türkiye blade plant

    May 13, 2026

    ‘Fatality at South Korean wind farm’

    May 13, 2026

    Scottish onshore wind forum launches

    May 12, 2026

    ENOVA starts 30MW Hiddels repowering

    May 12, 2026

    Iberdrola buys 40MW Italian wind farm

    May 12, 2026
  • Solar

    VSB secures Sicily PV project approval

    May 13, 2026

    Matrix connects two Spanish renewable projects

    May 13, 2026

    Qualitas targets €10bn energy investments

    May 12, 2026

    Consultation opens for 49.9MW Barrons Solar

    May 12, 2026

    Great North Road solar nears decision

    May 11, 2026
  • Other News
    • Energy Storage
    • Finance
    • Grid
    • People
    • reMIX
  • More
    • Company Profiles
    • Events
    • National Wind Energy Awards 2026
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
reNEWSreNEWS
Home » Uncategorized » US offshore wind is ‘currently uneconomical’
Offshore Wind

US offshore wind is ‘currently uneconomical’

Robin LancasterBy Robin LancasterFebruary 24, 20203 Mins Read
Estonia starts assessment for offshore trio

The US offshore wind sector is currently uneconomical, according to research by S&P Global Ratings.

In its ‘Foresight is 2020: Tailwinds for US offshore expansion’ report, S&P said it estimates the levelised cost of energy (LCOE) for US offshore wind, excluding an investment tax credit, to be about $85 a megawatt-hour.

Advertisement

The LCOE falls to $65/MWh with a 30% investment tax credit, it added.

This is higher than for current alternatives, such as natural gas peakers and onshore wind, which have LCOE of $68/MWh and $40/MWh respectively, the ratings agency said.

It noted that risks for offshore wind are different from that for onshore, with the latter having several years of experience in terms of construction, turbine performance, operations and maintenance cost predictability and a track record of power generation.

The report identifies the onshore transmission needed to accommodate offshore wind capacity as the main concern of industry experts.

These concerns include unplanned costs of upgrading onshore transmission, placement of projects in independent system operator queues to interconnect on time, and the areas to tie in offshore cables.

S&P said that integrating 26GW of offshore wind – the current aggregate pipeline volume – will “almost certainly require the development of networked offshore grids and approximately 3000 miles of offshore transmission lines”.

Nearly half of the offshore wind LCOE gap between Europe and the US stems from costs related to hardening of onshore networks and development of offshore transmission, the report added.

But, it said, lessons could be learned from experiences in other countries and a step in the right direction is a partnership between Anbaric and and the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan.

The partners filed an application with the Bureau of Ocean Energy Manager in November last year to develop an open-access offshore transmission system that will connect up to 16GW of offshore wind energy to southern New England states.

S&P also said that, despite the risks, investors and lenders are taking a much greater interest in the offshore wind sector.

This is being driven by the potential for dramatic declines in cost once the industry scales up, and other factors, such as the higher volumes of energy that could be delivered compared with onshore wind and closer location to demand centres.

The report’s authors said they are “cautiously optimistic about prospects for offshore wind energy output”.

However, “the onus is on the industry to convince us of offshore wind’s potential from a credit perspective”.

Offshore Wind
Share. Facebook LinkedIn Bluesky Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
Previous ArticleTriton Knoll welcomes new recruits
Next Article Northland expands Korean offshore horizons

Related News

Renewables LCoE continues on downward trajectory

October 22, 2024

Solar, onshore wind electricity prices ‘rise in APAC’

February 14, 2023

‘Cheaper renewables trumping fossil fuels’

April 28, 2020
Advertisement

Latest News

PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

May 13, 2026

All-Energy 2026: Shanks bullish on UK clean power

May 13, 2026

GWEC, TÜREB launch wind partnership

May 13, 2026

ENERCON to build Türkiye blade plant

May 13, 2026
Advertisement

Advertisement

Company Profiles
  • Collett & Sons Ltd
  • Leask Marine
  • TGS
  • Seaway7
    Seaway7
  • Qualsurv Marine Consulting
    Qualsurv Marine Consulting
  • Pembroke Port
  • Ørsted
  • Oceantic Network
  • Natural Power
    Natural Power
  • LSP
    LSP Renewables
reNEWS
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
reMIX | Company Profiles | Industry Events
Get in touch | Advertising with us | About reNEWS

© 2026 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}