Close Menu
reNEWSreNEWS
  • Home
  • Offshore Wind
  • Onshore Wind
  • Solar
  • Other News
    • Energy Storage
    • Finance
    • Grid
    • People
    • reMIX
  • More
    • Company Profiles
    • Events
    • National Wind Energy Awards 2026
Latest News

PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

All-Energy 2026: Shanks bullish on UK clean power

GWEC, TÜREB launch wind partnership

LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
  • Email Briefings
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
reNEWSreNEWS
  • Home
  • Offshore Wind

    PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

    May 13, 2026

    UK offshore wind pipeline reaches 93GW

    May 13, 2026

    Seaway7 completes Hai Long cable works

    May 13, 2026

    DEME names new jack-up vessel

    May 13, 2026

    Mubadala invests $325m into Hornsea 3

    May 13, 2026
  • Onshore Wind

    ENERCON to build Türkiye blade plant

    May 13, 2026

    ‘Fatality at South Korean wind farm’

    May 13, 2026

    Scottish onshore wind forum launches

    May 12, 2026

    ENOVA starts 30MW Hiddels repowering

    May 12, 2026

    Iberdrola buys 40MW Italian wind farm

    May 12, 2026
  • Solar

    VSB secures Sicily PV project approval

    May 13, 2026

    Matrix connects two Spanish renewable projects

    May 13, 2026

    Qualitas targets €10bn energy investments

    May 12, 2026

    Consultation opens for 49.9MW Barrons Solar

    May 12, 2026

    Great North Road solar nears decision

    May 11, 2026
  • Other News
    • Energy Storage
    • Finance
    • Grid
    • People
    • reMIX
  • More
    • Company Profiles
    • Events
    • National Wind Energy Awards 2026
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
reNEWSreNEWS
Home » Uncategorized » Danes should ‘consider nearshore benefits’
Offshore Wind

Danes should ‘consider nearshore benefits’

SaraBy SaraOctober 8, 20193 Mins Read
Danes should 'consider nearshore benefits'

Coastal communities will benefit more from nearshore wind farms compared with offshore facilities located over 20 km from shore, a new Danish study has found.

The analysis, by KPMG for HOFOR and European Energy, suggests wind farms closer to the coast can contribute to a cost-effective achievement of Denmark’s target to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 70% by 2030.

Advertisement

HOFOR business and finance director Jan Kauffmann said Denmark cannot rely on North Sea wind underpinning the entire green transition.

“It is too expensive and, moreover, risky for security of supply, which becomes stronger when we have a mix of different technologies and renewable energy sources,” he said.

The study has produced several scenarios based on publicly available data.

It compares the planned 1GW Danish offshore wind project Thor with five coastal offshore wind farms with the same total capacity.

The 1GW of coastal wind farms achieve a socio-economic gain of 2-14% compared with the large offshore wind farm far from shore.

“The analysis shows that coastal winds are cheap, quick to establish and easier to locate near the major cities where power is needed. Considering how big the green transition is, coastal wind is an important solution to achieve in the Danish goal,” said Kauffmann.

The study highlights that the shorter distance to the coast and lower water depth make it cheaper to establish nearshore wind farms.

Other savings come from reduced cabling and electrical infrastructure costs when locating wind farms close to shore and closer to the onshore power grid.

KPMG’s study also found that having smaller coastal wind farms increases security of supply, as any interruption to supply is limited to one of the individual sites, rather than affecting the supply of one very big wind farm.

HOFOR is currently developing two coastal wind parks, while European Energy is working on three parks, as well as a pilot off Frederikshavn.

All five projects will use existing onshore grid infrastructure to relocate the electricity produced to consumers, whereas a large-scale offshore wind farm such as Thor will require offshore transformers and grid reinforcement.

European Energy managing director Knud Erik Andersen said electricity grid upgrades are an expense that building coastal offshore wind farms can avoid.

Both European Energy and HOFOR said that while Denmark should exploit the favourable wind conditions in the North Sea, solar, onshore wind, coastal wind parks and biogas also have a “natural place in the Danish energy mix”, as each technology has specific advantages that complement the others.

Offshore Wind
Share. Facebook LinkedIn Bluesky Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
Previous ArticleSolar O&M market ‘set to double’ by 2024
Next Article Sungrow supplies storage in Massachusetts

Related News

Hofor has offshore wind permit revoked

July 6, 2023

Orsted lines up Danish offshore wind power play

May 31, 2021

Seabed surveys start on 560MW Danish nearshore duo

August 19, 2020
Advertisement

Latest News

PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

May 13, 2026

All-Energy 2026: Shanks bullish on UK clean power

May 13, 2026

GWEC, TÜREB launch wind partnership

May 13, 2026

ENERCON to build Türkiye blade plant

May 13, 2026
Advertisement

Advertisement

Company Profiles
  • Collett & Sons Ltd
  • TGS
  • Seaway7
    Seaway7
  • Pembroke Port
  • Ørsted
  • Natural Power
    Natural Power
  • LSP
    LSP Renewables
  • EDF
    EDF
  • Brightwind
    BrightWind Limited
  • Bilfinger UK
reNEWS
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
reMIX | Company Profiles | Industry Events
Get in touch | Advertising with us | About reNEWS

© 2026 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}