Close Menu
reNEWSreNEWS
  • Home
  • Offshore Wind
  • Onshore Wind
  • Solar
  • Other News
    • Energy Storage
    • Finance
    • Grid
    • People
    • reMIX
  • More
    • Company Profiles
    • Events
    • National Wind Energy Awards 2026
Latest News

PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

All-Energy 2026: Shanks bullish on UK clean power

GWEC, TÜREB launch wind partnership

LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
  • Email Briefings
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
reNEWSreNEWS
  • Home
  • Offshore Wind

    PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

    May 13, 2026

    UK offshore wind pipeline reaches 93GW

    May 13, 2026

    Seaway7 completes Hai Long cable works

    May 13, 2026

    DEME names new jack-up vessel

    May 13, 2026

    Mubadala invests $325m into Hornsea 3

    May 13, 2026
  • Onshore Wind

    ENERCON to build Türkiye blade plant

    May 13, 2026

    ‘Fatality at South Korean wind farm’

    May 13, 2026

    Scottish onshore wind forum launches

    May 12, 2026

    ENOVA starts 30MW Hiddels repowering

    May 12, 2026

    Iberdrola buys 40MW Italian wind farm

    May 12, 2026
  • Solar

    VSB secures Sicily PV project approval

    May 13, 2026

    Matrix connects two Spanish renewable projects

    May 13, 2026

    Qualitas targets €10bn energy investments

    May 12, 2026

    Consultation opens for 49.9MW Barrons Solar

    May 12, 2026

    Great North Road solar nears decision

    May 11, 2026
  • Other News
    • Energy Storage
    • Finance
    • Grid
    • People
    • reMIX
  • More
    • Company Profiles
    • Events
    • National Wind Energy Awards 2026
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
reNEWSreNEWS
Home » Uncategorized » ‘Galloway national park could spell £543m loss’
Onshore Wind

‘Galloway national park could spell £543m loss’

reNEWS EditorialBy reNEWS EditorialMay 5, 20253 Mins Read
'Galloway national park could spell £543m loss'

The proposed establishment of a national park in Galloway could result in the loss of around half a billion pounds to the area over the next decade, according to Scotland’s onshore wind industry.

The warning from trade body Scottish Renewables comes ahead of an imminent deadline for NatureScot to submit its advice to the Scottish Government following an extended public consultation period.

Advertisement

No decision to designate a third national park has yet been taken – and ministers will now consider the proposal.

Scottish Renewables is warning policymakers that the potential economic and environmental benefits of onshore wind development in Dumfries and Galloway “far outweigh” the advantages of a national park designation.

Research from Biggar Economics found that a new national park in Galloway would likely reduce economic activity as onshore wind developers face increased challenges and opposition to developments near the park.

This would hinder the deployment of onshore wind projects, resulting in reduced economic activity, lower community benefit payments, and difficulties in meeting national renewable energy targets by 2030, the report warned.

Projections from the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero indicate that Dumfries and Galloway could generate up to 3.2GW of energy from onshore wind by 2035.

This would contribute approximately £935m over the next decade and support up to 624 jobs annually at peak activity.

Community benefit payments in the region could amount to £146m by 2035.

However, Biggar Economics found that adopting a planning regime similar to Scotland’s existing national parks could result in the Galloway region suffering a cumulative economic loss of around £543m by 2035, with 470 fewer jobs supported annually at peak activity.

The region could also miss out on approximately £64m in community benefit funding.

The Scottish Government’s Onshore Wind Policy Statement aims to achieve 20GW of onshore wind capacity by 2030.

Scottish Renewables chief executive Claire Mack (pictured) said: “The proposal to designate a new national park in Dumfries and Galloway must be weighed carefully against the significant economic and environmental contributions of renewable energy projects currently in development.

“Research by Biggar Economics shows that blocking onshore wind developments alone could lead to fewer jobs, lower investment, and lost opportunities for communities.

“And that’s just part of the picture – the study didn’t include the impact of losing solar, battery storage, or transmission projects, which would make the economic hit even worse.

“It’s also important to remember renewable energy projects are already delivering tangible environmental gains.

“They are subject to rigorous habitat and peatland management plans and, under the Scottish Onshore Wind Sector Deal, are committed to achieving biodiversity net gain.

“In many cases, the level of ecological restoration supported by renewable developers exceeds what could be achieved through public funding alone.

“A National Park designation should not come at the cost of clean energy, green jobs, and vital infrastructure.”

Biggar Economics Dumfries and Galloway Galloway national park Onshore Wind Renewable energy news research Scottish Renewables
Share. Facebook LinkedIn Bluesky Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
Previous ArticleEnBW switches on debut wind farm battery
Next Article New designs unveiled for 300MW Calderdale project

Related News

‘8000 Scottish jobs at risk from zonal energy pricing’

April 7, 2025

RES files plans for 92MW Scottish wind project

February 20, 2025

Scottish projects ‘could more than double UK hydro capacity’

May 10, 2023
Advertisement

Latest News

PODCAST: Is UK offshore wind back on track?

May 13, 2026

All-Energy 2026: Shanks bullish on UK clean power

May 13, 2026

GWEC, TÜREB launch wind partnership

May 13, 2026

ENERCON to build Türkiye blade plant

May 13, 2026
Advertisement

Advertisement

Company Profiles
  • Collett & Sons Ltd
  • Leask Marine
  • Qualsurv Marine Consulting
    Qualsurv Marine Consulting
  • Pembroke Port
  • Ørsted
  • LSP
    LSP Renewables
  • Full Circle Wind Services
  • EEW
    EEW Special Pipe Constructions GmbH
  • EDF
    EDF
  • Brightwind
    BrightWind Limited
reNEWS
LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
reMIX | Company Profiles | Industry Events
Get in touch | Advertising with us | About reNEWS

© 2026 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}